Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 132 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Server/Workstation
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
