Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2678 v3 outperforms Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-4130T - 161 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Server/Workstation
Core i3-4130T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 120 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
