Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2678 v3 outperforms Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-530 - 198 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 73 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-530 |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |