Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2678 v3 outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G550 - 178 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |