Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$135
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3584 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |