Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Xeon E5-2670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2670 - 152 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 - 65 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2670
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
