Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-2665 - 289 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 32 vs 16 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$435
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10444 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
115 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |