Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 105 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 40% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 167 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2660 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-13900K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 24 |
| 20 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
