Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 462 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 95 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2640 - 112 vs 110 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13635 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 220 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |