Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2433 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 22% better in Sea of Thieves than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 247 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
247
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$440
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $440 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3800 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |