Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2060 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 191 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$339
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3585 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |