Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3313 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 128% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 290 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 32 vs 16 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
290
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$469.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3598 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |