Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 3047 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 32% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 197 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-12500
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-12500 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
