Buy on Amazon
$270
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1439 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 22% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 530 vs 436 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 24 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
530
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Desktop Processor (YD192XA8AEWOF)
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
