Buy on Amazon
$37.5
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $417
Availability
MSRP in USD: $417
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $87
Availability
MSRP in USD: $87
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1705 days newer than Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Pentium G6950 - 213 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 73 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
210
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.5
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G6950 Processor 2.8GHz 3 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $37.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Haswell-E | Codename | Clarkdale |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 85 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
