Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1100 days newer than Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Pentium G630 - 284 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
272
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $37.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Intel Pentium G630 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
Haswell-E | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |