Buy on Amazon
$63.92
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $417
Availability
MSRP in USD: $417
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 848 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G3930 - 165 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 51 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
159
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930 Dual-core (2 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell-E | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 85 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
