Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Xeon E5-2609 v2 vs Core i7-9700F

Xeon E5-2609 v2 vs Core i7-9700F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-9700F

3.0 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i7-9700F Logo
Intel Core i7-9700F Desktop Processor 8 Core 3 GHz speed (Up to 4.7 GHz) Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W (BX80684I79700F)

Buy for $279 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 134 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-9700F

3.0 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i7-9700F Logo
Intel Core i7-9700F Desktop Processor 8 Core 3 GHz speed (Up to 4.7 GHz) Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W (BX80684I79700F)

Buy for $279 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 134 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2060 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F

  • Performs up to 16% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 134 vs 116 FPS
  • Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 8 vs 4 threads
This is a free version of A Plague Tale: Requiem.
A Plague Tale: Requiem

A Plague Tale: Requiem

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 Logo
Xeon E5-2609 v2

Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013


FPS

116

86%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Intel Core i7-9700F Logo
Core i7-9700F

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


FPS

134

100%

Value, $/FPS

$2.08/FPS

100%

Price, $

$279

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i7-9700F Desktop Processor 8 Core 3 GHz speed (Up to 4.7 GHz) Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W (BX80684I79700F)

Buy for $279 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 134 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 Logo
Xeon E5-2609 v2

Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013

Intel Core i7-9700F Logo
Core i7-9700F

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 Logo
Xeon E5-2609 v2

Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013


Single-Core

350

22%

Multi-Core

998

15%

Intel Core i7-9700F Logo
Core i7-9700F

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


Single-Core

1549

100%

Multi-Core

6256

100%

Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 Logo

Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2

vs
Intel Core i7-9700F Logo

Intel Core i7-9700F

Sep 1st, 2013Release Date
Apr 23rd, 2019
Xeon E5CollectionCore i7
Ivy BridgeCodenameCoffee Lake
Intel Socket 2011SocketIntel Socket 1151
Server
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
8
4Threads
8
2.5 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.0 GHz
2.5 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.7 GHz
80 WTDP
65 W
22 nmProcess Size
14 nm
25.0xMultiplier
30.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Xeon E5-2609 v2 or Core i7-9700F

A Plague Tale: Requiem, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.