Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Xeon E5-2430 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3897 days newer than Xeon E5-2430.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2430 - 229 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2430 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2430 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2430 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2430
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Ryzen 9 7900
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2430 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
