Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2430 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 847 days newer than Xeon E5-2430.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2430 - 125 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2430 - 85 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2430 - 16 vs 12 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2430 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 85 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |