Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 162 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2420 - 155 vs 153 FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
155
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$182.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $182.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |