Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1680 v4 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1680 v4 is 651 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4
- Performs up to 7% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 187 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 85 vs 140 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
