Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 1410 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 184 vs 183 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
