Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 2239 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 14% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 260 vs 228 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 127 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 127 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |