Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1660 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1660 is 1764 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660
- Performs up to 1% better in New World than Celeron G3930T - 100 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8955 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1660 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |