Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E3-1535M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1647 days newer than Xeon E3-1535M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 45% better in League of Legends than Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 206 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 20 vs 8 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |