Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1535M v5 outperforms Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1535M v5 is 434 days older than Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-7100T - 128 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 35 vs 45 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
126
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.1
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |