Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3929 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E3-1280 - 240 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 24 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
240
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$432.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5666 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |