Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2942 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 6% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E3-1280 - 124 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$339
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |