Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2942 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E3-1280 - 204 vs 193 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$57.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $57.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |