Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 847 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 77 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 0% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 213 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1275 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
