Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1270 v3 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1270 v3 is 1311 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930 - 342 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 51 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
322
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |