Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1205 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 22% better in Starfield than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 55 vs 45 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 35 vs 45 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |