Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1245 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1245 is 973 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1245
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1820 - 170 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1245 - 53 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
168
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1245 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |