Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4294 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Valheim than Xeon E3-1240 - 226 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 32 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
226
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$435
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |