Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2942 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E3-1240 - 207 vs 192 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 65 vs 80 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
207
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$279
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |