Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 2756 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than Xeon E3-1240 - 205 vs 191 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $275.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |