Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1096 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Deathloop than Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 181 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$405
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $405 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3754 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |