Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2535 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 139 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 32 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$469.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3980 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |