Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Xeon E3-1230 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2321 days newer than Xeon E3-1230.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1230
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 28% better in F1 23 than Xeon E3-1230 - 202 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 32 vs 8 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$493
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $493 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1230 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |