Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 222 days older than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 45 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E-2276M - 136 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 16 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$410
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $410 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |