Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Core i9-7940X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 635 days newer than Core i9-7940X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Core i9-7940X - 719 vs 714 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 45 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 28 vs 12 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
714
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$397.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $397.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
12 | Threads | 28 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |