Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 951 days newer than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E-2276M - 204 vs 188 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$899.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8958 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |