Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 412 days newer than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 45 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 3% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Xeon E-2276M - 146 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 32 vs 12 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$897.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $897.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8059 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |