Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Pentium P6200 vs Core i7-950

Pentium P6200 vs Core i7-950: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-950 outperforms Pentium P6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-950 is 481 days older than Pentium P6200.

Advantages of Intel Pentium P6200

  • Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 35 vs 130 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i7-950

  • Performs up to 3% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Pentium P6200 - 152 vs 147 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6200 - 8 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Horizon Zero Dawn.
Horizon Zero Dawn

Horizon Zero Dawn

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultimate

Intel Pentium P6200 Logo
Pentium P6200

Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010


FPS

147

96%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Intel Core i7-950 Logo
Core i7-950

Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009


FPS

152

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.66/FPS

100%

Price, $

$100

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i7-950 3.06 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1366 Processor

Buy for $100 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 160 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultimate

Intel Pentium P6200 Logo
Pentium P6200

Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010

Intel Core i7-950 Logo
Core i7-950

Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Pentium P6200 Logo
Pentium P6200

Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010


Single-Core

283

61%

Multi-Core

475

30%

Intel Core i7-950 Logo
Core i7-950

Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009


Single-Core

463

100%

Multi-Core

1569

100%

Intel Pentium P6200 Logo

Intel Pentium P6200

vs
Intel Core i7-950 Logo

Intel Core i7-950

Sep 26th, 2010
Release DateJun 2nd, 2009
PentiumCollectionCore i7
ArrandaleCodenameBloomfield
Intel Socket G1SocketIntel Socket 1366
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
4
2Threads
8
2.1 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.1 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed3.3 GHz
35 W
TDP130 W
32 nm
Process Size45 nm
16.0xMultiplier
23.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.