Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Pentium P6200 vs Core i7-920

Pentium P6200 vs Core i7-920: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-920 outperforms Pentium P6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-920 is 678 days older than Pentium P6200.

Advantages of Intel Pentium P6200

  • Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 35 vs 130 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i7-920

  • Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Pentium P6200 - 213 vs 211 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6200 - 8 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Death Stranding.
Death Stranding

Death Stranding

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Very High

Intel Pentium P6200 Logo
Pentium P6200

Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010


FPS

211

99%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Intel Core i7-920 Logo
Core i7-920

Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008


FPS

213

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.42/FPS

100%

Price, $

$90

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i7 Processor i7-920 2.66GHz 8 MB LGA1366 CPU BX80601920

Buy for $90 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 212 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Very High

Intel Pentium P6200 Logo
Pentium P6200

Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010

Intel Core i7-920 Logo
Core i7-920

Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Pentium P6200 Logo
Pentium P6200

Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010


Single-Core

283

68%

Multi-Core

475

33%

Intel Core i7-920 Logo
Core i7-920

Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008


Single-Core

415

100%

Multi-Core

1434

100%

Intel Pentium P6200 Logo

Intel Pentium P6200

vs
Intel Core i7-920 Logo

Intel Core i7-920

Sep 26th, 2010
Release DateNov 17th, 2008
PentiumCollectionCore i7
ArrandaleCodenameBloomfield
Intel Socket G1SocketIntel Socket 1366
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
4
2Threads
8
2.1 GHzBase Clock Speed
2.7 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed2.9 GHz
35 W
TDP130 W
32 nm
Process Size45 nm
16.0xMultiplier
20.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.