Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Pentium P6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3504 days newer than Pentium P6200.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6200
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 165% better in Diablo IV than Pentium P6200 - 204 vs 77 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6200 - 8 vs 2 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Pentium P6200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |