Buy on Amazon
$59.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $64
Availability
MSRP in USD: $64
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium Gold G5400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium Gold G5400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 759 days newer than the cheaper Pentium Gold G5400T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400T
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $59.95 vs $259.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10900F - $0.53 vs $2.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Pentium Gold G5400T - 124 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400T - 20 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium Gold G5400T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
113
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium Gold G5400T Processor 4M Cache 3.10 GHz LGA1151 (OEM Tray CPU)
Buy for $59.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.1/FPS
25%
Price, $
$259.99
23%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $259.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium Gold G5400T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium Gold G5400T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Pentium Gold | Collection | Core i9 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
