Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3766 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $47.48 vs $225.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-10700F - $0.42 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 18% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Pentium G6950 - 135 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 16 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
114
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3913 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
25%
Price, $
$225.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3914 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |