Buy on Amazon
$40.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 2038 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - $40.99 vs $199.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i7-8700T - $0.77 vs $1.27 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 196% better in League of Legends than Pentium G645 - 157 vs 53 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Pentium G645 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645 - 12 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Pentium G645
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
53
33.75796178343949%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$40.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G645 Dual-Core Processor 2.9 Ghz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623G645
Buy for $40.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2841 minutes ago
Core i7-8700T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
157
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
60.629921259842526%
Price, $
$199
20%
FPS Winner
Intel CM8068403358413 Core i7-8700T Prcsr Tray
Buy for $199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2846 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Pentium G645
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Core i7-8700T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G645
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
465
35.17397881996974%
Multi-Core
800
17.053933063312726%
Intel Pentium G645 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
